Tokenization as a Service · evidence-led procurement

Build a defensible vendor shortlist.

Turn a tokenization idea into hard gates, accountable provider roles, and a source-linked procurement brief—before vendor demos shape the decision.

Find matching providers Explore evidence profiles

5distinct provider layers

6public evidence profiles

0paid rank influence

Procurement brief Example

Asset profile

Private credit fund

JurisdictionUnited States

Investor baseAccredited

StagePre-procurement

Open issues3 hard gates

Accountable role stack

01Offering & legal structureUnresolved

02Issuance & lifecycleRequired

03Custody & settlementRequired

04Distribution pathwayValidate

Gate-first matchingUnranked research candidates appear when the inputs are comparable

Evidence before claims
Origin, source, and review date stay visible.

Roles before brands
Compare substitutes inside the same provider layer.

Money stays separate
Commercial relationships never change evidence status.

Plain-language definition

What is Tokenization as a Service?

On TaaS.solutions, Tokenization as a Service (TaaS) means the software and operational support used to issue, manage, transfer, distribute, custody, or settle tokenized assets.

It is not treated as one uniform vendor category. A defensible procurement process separates accountable roles, resolves legal and operating gates, and compares only providers that can substitute for the same job.

Read the buyer’s guide →

Provider evidence directory

Compare like with like.

Public claims are normalized by accountable layer. The comparison tool only allows providers with a shared layer; complementary vendors belong in a role stack, not a substitute shortlist.

Role stackLegal & offering counsel · buyer-sourced

6 public evidence profiles No commercial relationships disclosed · verify before procurement

Official claim indexed

Issuance & lifecycle

Securitize

Digital-securities issuance, lifecycle, and distribution infrastructure.

FundsPrivate creditEquity

Best-fit hypothesis

Institutional issuers evaluating an integrated regulated workflow.

Coverage claimUnited States · Global

DeliveryManaged + platform

Evidence ledger3 official sources · checked 2026-08-12 ↗Commercial relationship: none disclosed

View profile

Official claim indexed

Identity & transfer compliance

Tokeny

Compliance-centered infrastructure for permissioned tokenized assets.

FundsDebtReal estate

Best-fit hypothesis

Programs prioritizing identity, transfer controls, and lifecycle rules.

Coverage claimEurope · Global

DeliveryPlatform + APIs

Evidence ledger3 official sources · checked 2026-08-12 ↗Commercial relationship: none disclosed

View profile

Official claim indexed

Custody & wallet infrastructure

Taurus

Institutional custody, tokenization, and trading infrastructure.

FundsDebtEquity

Best-fit hypothesis

Financial institutions evaluating modular digital-asset infrastructure.

Coverage claimEurope · Global

DeliveryEnterprise platform

Evidence ledger3 official sources · checked 2026-08-12 ↗Commercial relationship: none disclosed

View profile

Official claim indexed

Custody & wallet infrastructure

Fireblocks

Enterprise wallet, settlement, and digital-asset infrastructure.

StablecoinsEquityDebt

Best-fit hypothesis

Teams building token products on wallet and settlement rails.

Coverage claimGlobal

DeliveryAPIs + platform

Evidence ledger3 official sources · checked 2026-08-12 ↗Commercial relationship: none disclosed

View profile

Official claim indexed

Issuance & lifecycle

DigiShares

White-label issuance and investor-management software.

Real estateFunds

Best-fit hypothesis

Real-estate and fund sponsors evaluating a branded investor portal.

Coverage claimEurope · Global

DeliveryWhite-label platform

Evidence ledger3 official sources · checked 2026-08-12 ↗Commercial relationship: none disclosed

View profile

Official claim indexed

Issuance & lifecycle

Brickken

Digital-asset creation and management for real-world assets.

Real estateEquityDebtPrivate credit

Best-fit hypothesis

Mid-market issuers evaluating guided setup and investor onboarding.

Coverage claimEurope · Global

DeliveryPlatform + services

Evidence ledger3 official sources · checked 2026-08-12 ↗Commercial relationship: none disclosed

View profile

Buyer-paid procurement support

Buy clarity before software.

Fixed-fee deliverables align revenue with better buyer decisions. TaaS does not take compensation based on capital raised, securities sold, or provider selection.

01 · Diagnostic

Readiness & Vendor Landscape Memo

Hard gates, accountable role stack, evidence gaps, and a category-level market map.

$1,500–$3,000See scope →

02 · Procurement

Requirements & RFP Sprint

Normalized requirements, bidder questions, response matrix, and decision workshop.

$7,500–$15,000See scope →

Boundary

Independent of transaction outcome

No success fees. No sale of investor access. No provider can purchase evidence status or shortlist position.

Fixed fee onlyRead the policy →

Decision workflow

From ambiguity to an auditable shortlist.

Resolve hard gates

Document rights, offering pathway, investor eligibility, jurisdiction, and transfer constraints.

Assign accountable roles

Separate legal, issuance, identity, custody, distribution, and settlement responsibilities.

Compare field evidence

Record source origin, review date, commercial relationship, and unresolved validation questions.

Run one normalized RFP

Give candidates the same brief so capabilities, responsibilities, and pricing become comparable.

Free provider finder

Requirements first.
Then candidates.

Resolve enough project context to generate an unranked, source-linked research set. Ambiguous inputs remain withheld instead of producing false precision.

Find providers

Machine-facing procurement data

The same evidence model,
structured for AI agents.

Search providers by role layer, reject invalid comparisons, preserve evidence provenance, and escalate consequential decisions to a human.

Explore agent access

comparison-response.jsonv1

{
  "object": "provider.comparison",
  "shared_layers": ["Issuance & lifecycle"],
  "evidence_policy": {
    "origin_required": true,
    "commercial_status_separate": true
  },
  "human_review_required": true
}

For tokenization providers

Earn legibility with evidence.

The first ten founding evidence profiles are free in exchange for source material and taxonomy feedback. Evidence status is never sold.

Join the founding cohort

Build a defensible vendor shortlist.

Private credit fund

What is Tokenization as a Service?

Compare like with like.

Securitize

Tokeny

Taurus

Fireblocks

DigiShares

Brickken

Buy clarity before software.

Readiness & Vendor Landscape Memo

Requirements & RFP Sprint

Independent of transaction outcome

From ambiguity to an auditable shortlist.

Resolve hard gates

Assign accountable roles

Compare field evidence

Run one normalized RFP

Requirements first. Then candidates.

The same evidence model, structured for AI agents.

Earn legibility with evidence.

Requirements first.
Then candidates.

The same evidence model,
structured for AI agents.